Application Allow Listing
Restricting which applications can execute on systems by maintaining a list of approved software. Only applications on the allow list can run, preventing unauthorized or malicious software execution.
Understanding Application Allow Listing
Application allow listing (whitelisting) is a security approach where only pre-approved applications can execute on a system. Unlike antivirus which tries to identify known bad software (block listing/blacklisting), allow listing assumes everything is blocked unless explicitly permitted.
Allow listing vs. Block listing: • Allow listing — Only approved apps can run (default deny) • Block listing — Known bad apps blocked (default allow)
Allow listing provides stronger security because it doesn't depend on knowing every malicious program—if it's not on the approved list, it simply can't run.
Why This Matters for the Exam
Application allow listing is tested on SY0-701 as an effective mitigation against malware and unauthorized software. Questions cover implementation approaches and the difference from traditional antivirus.
Understanding allow listing helps with endpoint security strategy. In high-security environments, allow listing significantly reduces risk from unknown malware.
The exam tests conceptual understanding and practical considerations like maintenance overhead and bypass techniques.
Deep Dive
How Allow Listing Works
Basic Process:
- 1.Inventory all legitimate applications
- 2.Create allow list of approved software
- 3.Configure system to block everything not on list
- 4.Monitor and update list as needed
Approval Criteria:
| Criteria | How It Works |
|---|---|
| Path-based | Allow from specific directories (C:\Program Files) |
| Hash-based | Allow specific file hashes (SHA-256) |
| Certificate-based | Allow apps signed by trusted publishers |
| Publisher-based | Allow from specific software vendors |
Allow Listing Methods
Path-Based Rules:
- •```
- •Allow: C:\Windows\*
- •Allow: C:\Program Files\*
- •Allow: C:\Program Files (x86)\*
- •Deny: All other locations
- •```
*Pros:* Easy to implement, low maintenance *Cons:* Attacker can place malware in allowed paths
Hash-Based Rules:
- •```
- •Allow: SHA256=abc123... (notepad.exe)
- •Allow: SHA256=def456... (word.exe)
- •Deny: All other hashes
- •```
*Pros:* Very specific, hard to bypass *Cons:* Every update changes hash, high maintenance
Certificate-Based Rules:
- •```
- •Allow: Signed by Microsoft Corporation
- •Allow: Signed by Adobe Systems
- •Allow: Signed by Internal CA
- •Deny: Unsigned or untrusted signatures
- •```
*Pros:* Updates don't require rule changes *Cons:* Stolen certificates, signed malware exists
Implementation Technologies
Windows AppLocker:
- •Built into Windows Enterprise/Education
- •Rule types: Executable, Windows Installer, Script, Packaged Apps
- •Enforcement modes: Audit (log only) or Enforce (block)
- •Group Policy deployment
Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC):
- •More robust than AppLocker
- •Kernel-mode enforcement
- •Code integrity policies
- •Can prevent kernel drivers
Third-Party Solutions:
- •Carbon Black App Control
- •McAfee Application Control
- •Symantec Endpoint Protection
- •Ivanti Application Control
Implementation Considerations
Deployment Process:
| Phase | Action |
|---|---|
| Discovery | Audit mode to identify all running apps |
| Baseline | Create allow list from discovered apps |
| Testing | Test policy in limited environment |
| Pilot | Deploy to small user group |
| Rollout | Gradual production deployment |
| Maintenance | Ongoing updates and monitoring |
Maintenance Challenges:
- •New software requires approval process
- •Updates may change hashes
- •User requests for new applications
- •Emergency software needs
- •Shadow IT discovery
Allow Listing vs. Block Listing
| Aspect | Allow Listing | Block Listing |
|---|---|---|
| Default | Deny all | Allow all |
| Unknown malware | Blocked | Allowed |
| Maintenance | Higher | Lower |
| User impact | More restrictive | Less restrictive |
| False positives | Blocks legitimate new apps | May miss new malware |
| Zero-day protection | Strong | Weak |
Best Practices
Effective Implementation:
- •Start in audit mode before enforcing
- •Combine multiple criteria (path + signature)
- •Establish software request process
- •Regular policy reviews
- •Exception documentation
- •Admin bypass procedures for emergencies
How CompTIA Tests This
Example Analysis
Scenario: An organization implements application allow listing using path-based rules that allow execution from C:\Windows and C:\Program Files. A user receives a phishing email with a malicious attachment. The attachment saves itself to C:\Users\jsmith\Downloads and attempts to execute.
Analysis - Allow Listing Prevention:
What Happens: 1. User opens phishing email attachment 2. Malware saves to Downloads folder 3. Malware attempts to execute 4. Allow listing checks path: C:\Users\jsmith\Downloads 5. Path NOT in allowed list 6. Execution BLOCKED
Why This Works: • Path-based rule only allows trusted locations • User-writable folders (Downloads, Desktop, Temp) not allowed • Malware can't run even though it was downloaded • User action (opening attachment) doesn't lead to infection
Limitations: • If malware could write to C:\Program Files, it would run • Requires admin rights to install to allowed paths • Social engineering could trick user with admin rights
Additional Protections: • Combine path rules with signature requirements • Use hash-based rules for critical applications • Implement certificate-based rules for trusted publishers • Standard users should not have write access to allowed paths
Key insight: Allow listing blocks execution regardless of how malware arrived. Even successful phishing doesn't lead to infection if the payload can't execute.
Key Terms to Know
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Exam Tips
Memory Trick
Allow vs. Block Listing:
Allow listing = Approved only (Everything else denied)
Block listing = Bad blocked (Everything else allowed)
- •"Allow Wins for Zero-Day"
- •Unknown malware:
- •Allow list: Not approved → BLOCKED
- •Block list: Not known bad → ALLOWED
- •Rule Types: "PHCS"
- •Path-based (location rules)
- •Hash-based (file fingerprint)
- •Certificate-based (digital signature)
- •Software publisher (vendor trust)
Security Strength: Hash > Certificate > Path (Specific → General)
- •Deployment Phases: "DATPR"
- •Discover apps in use
- •Audit mode first
- •Test in limited scope
- •Pilot with small group
- •Rollout gradually
Test Your Knowledge
Q1.A user downloads and attempts to run a new malware variant that has never been seen before. How would application allow listing respond compared to traditional antivirus?
Q2.An organization uses hash-based application allow listing. What challenge will they face when approved software is updated?
Q3.Which application allow listing approach would require the LEAST maintenance when trusted vendors release software updates?
Want more practice with instant AI feedback?
Practice with AIContinue Learning
Ready to test your knowledge?
Practice questions on application allow listing and other Objective 2.5 concepts.